mirror of
https://github.com/privatevoid-net/nix-super.git
synced 2024-11-29 09:06:15 +02:00
Merge pull request #7883 from hercules-ci/json-guidelines
cli-guideline: Add JSON guideline
This commit is contained in:
commit
4489def1b3
1 changed files with 82 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -389,6 +389,88 @@ colors, no emojis and using ASCII instead of Unicode symbols). The same should
|
||||||
happen when TTY is not detected on STDERR. We should not display progress /
|
happen when TTY is not detected on STDERR. We should not display progress /
|
||||||
status section, but only print warnings and errors.
|
status section, but only print warnings and errors.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Returning future proof JSON
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The schema of JSON output should allow for backwards compatible extension. This section explains how to achieve this.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Two definitions are helpful here, because while JSON only defines one "key-value"
|
||||||
|
object type, we use it to cover two use cases:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **dictionary**: a map from names to value that all have the same type. In
|
||||||
|
C++ this would be a `std::map` with string keys.
|
||||||
|
- **record**: a fixed set of attributes each with their own type. In C++, this
|
||||||
|
would be represented by a `struct`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It is best not to mix these use cases, as that may lead to incompatibilities when the schema changes. For example, adding a record field to a dictionary breaks consumers that assume all JSON object fields to have the same meaning and type.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This leads to the following guidelines:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- The top-level (root) value must be a record.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Otherwise, one can not change the structure of a command's output.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- The value of a dictionary item must be a record.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Otherwise, the item type can not be extended.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- List items should be records.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Otherwise, one can not change the structure of the list items.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If the order of the items does not matter, and each item has a unique key that is a string, consider representing the list as a dictionary instead. If the order of the items needs to be preserved, return a list of records.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Streaming JSON should return records.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
An example of a streaming JSON format is [JSON lines](https://jsonlines.org/), where each line represents a JSON value. These JSON values can be considered top-level values or list items, and they must be records.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Examples
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is bad, because all keys must be assumed to be store implementations:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```json
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"local": { ... },
|
||||||
|
"remote": { ... },
|
||||||
|
"http": { ... }
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is good, because the it is extensible at the root, and is somewhat self-documenting:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```json
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"storeTypes": { "local": { ... }, ... },
|
||||||
|
"pluginSupport": true
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While the dictionary of store types seems like a very complete response at first, a use case may arise that warrants returning additional information.
|
||||||
|
For example, the presence of plugin support may be crucial information for a client to proceed when their desired store type is missing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The following representation is bad because it is not extensible:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```json
|
||||||
|
{ "outputs": [ "out" "bin" ] }
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
However, simply converting everything to records is not enough, because the order of outputs must be preserved:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```json
|
||||||
|
{ "outputs": { "bin": {}, "out": {} } }
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The first item is the default output. Deriving this information from the outputs ordering is not great, but this is how Nix currently happens to work.
|
||||||
|
While it is possible for a JSON parser to preserve the order of fields, we can not rely on this capability to be present in all JSON libraries.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This representation is extensible and preserves the ordering:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```json
|
||||||
|
{ "outputs": [ { "outputName": "out" }, { "outputName": "bin" } ] }
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Dialog with the user
|
## Dialog with the user
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
CLIs don't always make it clear when an action has taken place. For every
|
CLIs don't always make it clear when an action has taken place. For every
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue