mirror of
https://github.com/privatevoid-net/nix-super.git
synced 2024-11-25 15:26:17 +02:00
add maintainers' handbook
write down the process we have been developing and following so far. Co-Authored-By: Théophane Hufschmitt <theophane.hufschmitt@tweag.io> Co-Authored-By: John Ericson <John.Ericson@Obsidian.Systems>
This commit is contained in:
parent
62960f3291
commit
a4af966d5d
1 changed files with 79 additions and 0 deletions
79
maintainers/README.md
Normal file
79
maintainers/README.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
|||
# Nix maintainers team
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
The goal of the team to help other people to contribute to Nix.
|
||||
|
||||
## Members
|
||||
|
||||
- Eelco Dolstra (@edolstra) – Team lead
|
||||
- Théophane Hufschmitt (@thufschmitt)
|
||||
- Valentin Gagarin (@fricklerhandwerk)
|
||||
- Thomas Bereknyei (@tomberek)
|
||||
- Robert Hensing (@roberth)
|
||||
|
||||
## Meeting protocol
|
||||
|
||||
The team meets twice a week:
|
||||
|
||||
- Discussion meeting: [Fridays 12:00-13:00 UTC](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?eid=MHNtOGVuNWtrZXNpZHR2bW1sM3QyN2ZjaGNfMjAyMjExMjVUMTIwMDAwWiBiOW81MmZvYnFqYWs4b3E4bGZraGczdDBxZ0Bn)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Triage issues and pull requests from the _No Status_ column (30 min)
|
||||
2. Discuss issues and pull requests from the _To discuss_ column (30 min)
|
||||
|
||||
- Work meeting: [Mondays 12:00-14:00 UTC](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?eid=NTM1MG1wNGJnOGpmOTZhYms3bTB1bnY5cWxfMjAyMjExMjFUMTIwMDAwWiBiOW81MmZvYnFqYWs4b3E4bGZraGczdDBxZ0Bn)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Code review on pull requests from _In review_.
|
||||
2. Other chores and tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
Meeting notes are collected on a [collaborative scratchpad](https://pad.lassul.us/Cv7FpYx-Ri-4VjUykQOLAw), and published on Discourse under the [Nix category](https://discourse.nixos.org/c/dev/nix/50).
|
||||
|
||||
## Project board protocol
|
||||
|
||||
The team uses a [GitHub project board](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/19/views/1) for tracking its work.
|
||||
|
||||
Issues on the board progress through the following states:
|
||||
|
||||
- No Status
|
||||
|
||||
Team members can add pull requests or issues to discuss or review together.
|
||||
|
||||
During the discussion meeting, the team triages new items.
|
||||
If there is disagreement on the general idea behind the issue or pull request, items are moved to _To discuss_, otherwise to _In review_.
|
||||
|
||||
- To discuss
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests and issues that are important and controverisal enough to warrant a discussion by the whole team.
|
||||
|
||||
This may be where the merit of the change itself or the implementation strategy is contested by a team member.
|
||||
|
||||
- In review
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests in this column are reviewed together during work meetings.
|
||||
This is both for spreading implementation knowledge and for establishing common values in code reviews.
|
||||
|
||||
When the overall direction is agreed upon, even when further changes are required, the pull request is assigned to one team member.
|
||||
|
||||
- Assigned for merging
|
||||
|
||||
One team member is assigned to each of these pull requests.
|
||||
They will communicate with the authors, and make the final approval once all remaining issues are addressed.
|
||||
|
||||
If more substantive issues arise, the assignee can move the pull request back to _To discuss_ to involve the team again.
|
||||
|
||||
The process is illustrated in the following diagram:
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
flowchart TD
|
||||
discuss[To discuss]
|
||||
|
||||
review[To review]
|
||||
|
||||
New --> |Disagreement on idea| discuss
|
||||
New & discuss --> |Consensus on idea| review
|
||||
|
||||
review --> |Consensus on implementation| Assigned
|
||||
|
||||
Assigned --> |Implementation issues arise| review
|
||||
Assigned --> |Remaining issues fixed| Merged
|
||||
```
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue