From 0127d54d5e86db9039e6322d482d26e66af8bd8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rebecca Turner Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 19:14:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Enter debugger more reliably in let expressions and calls --- src/libexpr/eval.cc | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/libexpr/eval.cc b/src/libexpr/eval.cc index 91fd3ddf8..df40b18b8 100644 --- a/src/libexpr/eval.cc +++ b/src/libexpr/eval.cc @@ -846,20 +846,20 @@ void EvalState::addErrorTrace(Error & e, const PosIdx pos, const char * s, const e.addTrace(positions[pos], hintfmt(s, s2), frame); } +template static std::unique_ptr makeDebugTraceStacker( EvalState & state, Expr & expr, Env & env, std::shared_ptr && pos, - const char * s, - const std::string & s2) + const Args & ... formatArgs) { return std::make_unique(state, DebugTrace { .pos = std::move(pos), .expr = expr, .env = env, - .hint = hintfmt(s, s2), + .hint = hintfmt(formatArgs...), .isError = false }); } @@ -1322,6 +1322,19 @@ void ExprLet::eval(EvalState & state, Env & env, Value & v) for (auto & i : attrs->attrs) env2.values[displ++] = i.second.e->maybeThunk(state, i.second.inherited ? env : env2); + auto dts = state.debugRepl + ? makeDebugTraceStacker( + state, + *this, + env2, + getPos() + ? std::make_shared(state.positions[getPos()]) + : nullptr, + "while evaluating a '%1%' expression", + "let" + ) + : nullptr; + body->eval(state, env2, v); } @@ -1718,6 +1731,18 @@ void EvalState::callFunction(Value & fun, size_t nrArgs, Value * * args, Value & void ExprCall::eval(EvalState & state, Env & env, Value & v) { + auto dts = state.debugRepl + ? makeDebugTraceStacker( + state, + *this, + env, + getPos() + ? std::make_shared(state.positions[getPos()]) + : nullptr, + "while calling a function" + ) + : nullptr; + Value vFun; fun->eval(state, env, vFun); From 601fc7d15978827a04a1bc44e92a8a42a512f50a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rebecca Turner Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:13:26 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Add release note --- ...debugger-more-reliably-in-let-and-calls.md | 25 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/manual/rl-next/enter-debugger-more-reliably-in-let-and-calls.md diff --git a/doc/manual/rl-next/enter-debugger-more-reliably-in-let-and-calls.md b/doc/manual/rl-next/enter-debugger-more-reliably-in-let-and-calls.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c93225816 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/manual/rl-next/enter-debugger-more-reliably-in-let-and-calls.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +--- +synopsis: The `--debugger` will start more reliably in `let` expressions and function calls +prs: 9917 +issues: 6649 +--- + +Previously, if you attempted to evaluate this file with the debugger: + +```nix +let + a = builtins.trace "before inner break" ( + builtins.break "hello" + ); + b = builtins.trace "before outer break" ( + builtins.break a + ); +in + b +``` + +Nix would correctly enter the debugger at `builtins.break a`, but if you asked +it to `:continue`, it would skip over the `builtins.break "hello"` expression +entirely. + +Now, Nix will correctly enter the debugger at both breakpoints.