use self-descriptive name for config file parser, document

Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Valentin Gagarin 2024-07-04 10:36:48 +02:00
parent 509be0e77a
commit c66079f1e8

View file

@ -91,7 +91,14 @@ void Config::getSettings(std::map<std::string, SettingInfo> & res, bool overridd
}
static void applyConfigInner(const std::string & contents, const std::string & path, std::vector<std::pair<std::string, std::string>> & parsedContents) {
/**
* Parse configuration in `contents`, and also the configuration files included from there, with their location specified relative to `path`.
*
* `contents` and `path` represent the file that is being parsed.
* The result is only an intermediate list of key-value pairs of strings.
* More parsing according to the settings-specific semantics is being done by `loadConfFile` in `libstore/globals.cc`.
*/
static void parseConfigFiles(const std::string & contents, const std::string & path, std::vector<std::pair<std::string, std::string>> & parsedContents) {
unsigned int pos = 0;
while (pos < contents.size()) {
@ -125,7 +132,7 @@ static void applyConfigInner(const std::string & contents, const std::string & p
if (pathExists(p)) {
try {
std::string includedContents = readFile(p);
applyConfigInner(includedContents, p, parsedContents);
parseConfigFiles(includedContents, p, parsedContents);
} catch (SystemError &) {
// TODO: Do we actually want to ignore this? Or is it better to fail?
}
@ -153,7 +160,7 @@ static void applyConfigInner(const std::string & contents, const std::string & p
void AbstractConfig::applyConfig(const std::string & contents, const std::string & path) {
std::vector<std::pair<std::string, std::string>> parsedContents;
applyConfigInner(contents, path, parsedContents);
parseConfigFiles(contents, path, parsedContents);
// First apply experimental-feature related settings
for (const auto & [name, value] : parsedContents)