mirror of
https://github.com/privatevoid-net/nix-super.git
synced 2024-11-09 15:58:05 +02:00
use headings instead of list items
this allows easier linking and a provides a bit more visual clarity
This commit is contained in:
Valentin Gagarin
parent
521cca1840
commit
feb2200ba6
1 changed files with 48 additions and 46 deletions
|
|
@ -42,12 +42,12 @@ The team meets twice a week:
|
|||
|
||||
- Discussion meeting: [Fridays 13:00-14:00 CET](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?eid=MHNtOGVuNWtrZXNpZHR2bW1sM3QyN2ZjaGNfMjAyMjExMjVUMTIwMDAwWiBiOW81MmZvYnFqYWs4b3E4bGZraGczdDBxZ0Bn)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Triage issues and pull requests from the _No Status_ column (30 min)
|
||||
2. Discuss issues and pull requests from the _To discuss_ column (30 min)
|
||||
1. Triage issues and pull requests from the [No Status](#no-status) column (30 min)
|
||||
2. Discuss issues and pull requests from the [To discuss](#to-discuss) column (30 min)
|
||||
|
||||
- Work meeting: [Mondays 13:00-15:00 CET](https://calendar.google.com/calendar/event?eid=NTM1MG1wNGJnOGpmOTZhYms3bTB1bnY5cWxfMjAyMjExMjFUMTIwMDAwWiBiOW81MmZvYnFqYWs4b3E4bGZraGczdDBxZ0Bn)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Code review on pull requests from _In review_.
|
||||
1. Code review on pull requests from [In review](#in-review).
|
||||
2. Other chores and tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
Meeting notes are collected on a [collaborative scratchpad](https://pad.lassul.us/Cv7FpYx-Ri-4VjUykQOLAw), and published on Discourse under the [Nix category](https://discourse.nixos.org/c/dev/nix/50).
|
||||
|
|
@ -58,72 +58,74 @@ The team uses a [GitHub project board](https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/19
|
|||
|
||||
Items on the board progress through the following states:
|
||||
|
||||
- No Status
|
||||
### No Status
|
||||
|
||||
During the discussion meeting, the team triages new items.
|
||||
To be considered, issues and pull requests must have a high-level description to provide the whole team with the necessary context at a glance.
|
||||
During the discussion meeting, the team triages new items.
|
||||
To be considered, issues and pull requests must have a high-level description to provide the whole team with the necessary context at a glance.
|
||||
|
||||
On every meeting, at least one item from each of the following categories is inspected:
|
||||
On every meeting, at least one item from each of the following categories is inspected:
|
||||
|
||||
1. [critical](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/critical)
|
||||
2. [security](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/security)
|
||||
3. [regression](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/regression)
|
||||
4. [bug](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Abug+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
5. [tests of existing functionality](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Atests+-label%3Afeature+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
1. [critical](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/critical)
|
||||
2. [security](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/security)
|
||||
3. [regression](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/regression)
|
||||
4. [bug](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Abug+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
5. [tests of existing functionality](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aopen+label%3Atests+-label%3Afeature+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
|
||||
- [oldest pull requests](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc)
|
||||
- [most popular pull requests](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
- [oldest issues](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc)
|
||||
- [most popular issues](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
- [oldest pull requests](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc)
|
||||
- [most popular pull requests](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
- [oldest issues](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Acreated-asc)
|
||||
- [most popular issues](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Areactions-%2B1-desc)
|
||||
|
||||
Team members can also add pull requests or issues they would like the whole team to consider.
|
||||
To ensure process quality and reliability, all non-trivial pull requests must be triaged before merging.
|
||||
Team members can also add pull requests or issues they would like the whole team to consider.
|
||||
To ensure process quality and reliability, all non-trivial pull requests must be triaged before merging.
|
||||
|
||||
If there is disagreement on the general idea behind an issue or pull request, it is moved to _To discuss_.
|
||||
Otherwise, the issue or pull request in questions get the label [`idea approved`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/idea%20approved).
|
||||
For issues this means that an implementation is welcome and will be prioritised for review.
|
||||
For pull requests this means that:
|
||||
- Unfinished work is encouraged to be continued.
|
||||
- A reviewer is assigned to take responsibility for getting the pull request merged.
|
||||
The item is moved to the _Assigned_ column.
|
||||
- If needed, the team can decide to do a collarorative review.
|
||||
Then the item is moved to the _In review_ column, and review session is scheduled.
|
||||
If there is disagreement on the general idea behind an issue or pull request, it is moved to [To discuss](#to-discuss).
|
||||
Otherwise, the issue or pull request in questions get the label [`idea approved`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/labels/idea%20approved).
|
||||
For issues this means that an implementation is welcome and will be prioritised for review.
|
||||
For pull requests this means that:
|
||||
- Unfinished work is encouraged to be continued.
|
||||
- A reviewer is assigned to take responsibility for getting the pull request merged.
|
||||
The item is moved to the [Assigned](#assigned) column.
|
||||
- If needed, the team can decide to do a collarorative review.
|
||||
Then the item is moved to the [In review](#in-review) column, and review session is scheduled.
|
||||
|
||||
What constitutes a trivial pull request is up to maintainers' judgement.
|
||||
What constitutes a trivial pull request is up to maintainers' judgement.
|
||||
|
||||
- To discuss
|
||||
### To discuss
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests and issues that are deemed important and controversial are discussed by the team during discussion meetings.
|
||||
Pull requests and issues that are deemed important and controversial are discussed by the team during discussion meetings.
|
||||
|
||||
This may be where the merit of the change itself or the implementation strategy is contested by a team member.
|
||||
This may be where the merit of the change itself or the implementation strategy is contested by a team member.
|
||||
|
||||
As a general guideline, the order of items is determined as follows:
|
||||
As a general guideline, the order of items is determined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
- Prioritise pull requests over issues
|
||||
- Prioritise pull requests over issues
|
||||
|
||||
Contributors who took the time to implement concrete change proposals should not wait indefinitely.
|
||||
Contributors who took the time to implement concrete change proposals should not wait indefinitely.
|
||||
|
||||
- Prioritise fixing bugs and testing over documentation, improvements or new features
|
||||
- Prioritise fixing bugs and testing over documentation, improvements or new features
|
||||
|
||||
The team values stability and accessibility higher than raw functionality.
|
||||
The team values stability and accessibility higher than raw functionality.
|
||||
|
||||
- Interleave issues and PRs
|
||||
- Interleave issues and PRs
|
||||
|
||||
This way issues without attempts at a solution get a chance to get addressed.
|
||||
This way issues without attempts at a solution get a chance to get addressed.
|
||||
|
||||
- In review
|
||||
### In review
|
||||
|
||||
Pull requests in this column are reviewed together during work meetings.
|
||||
This is both for spreading implementation knowledge and for establishing common values in code reviews.
|
||||
Pull requests in this column are reviewed together during work meetings.
|
||||
This is both for spreading implementation knowledge and for establishing common values in code reviews.
|
||||
|
||||
When the overall direction is agreed upon, even when further changes are required, the pull request is assigned to one team member.
|
||||
When the overall direction is agreed upon, even when further changes are required, the pull request is assigned to one team member.
|
||||
|
||||
- Assigned
|
||||
### Assigned
|
||||
|
||||
One team member is assigned to each of these pull requests.
|
||||
They will communicate with the authors, and make the final approval once all remaining issues are addressed.
|
||||
One team member is assigned to each of these pull requests.
|
||||
They will communicate with the authors, and make the final approval once all remaining issues are addressed.
|
||||
|
||||
If more substantive issues arise, the assignee can move the pull request back to _To discuss_ or _In review_ to involve the team again.
|
||||
If more substantive issues arise, the assignee can move the pull request back to [To discuss](#to-discuss) or [In review](#in-review) to involve the team again.
|
||||
|
||||
### Flowchart
|
||||
|
||||
The process is illustrated in the following diagram:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue