This was caused by SubstitutionGoal not setting the errorMsg field in
its BuildResult. We now get a more descriptive message than in 2.7.0, e.g.
error: path '/nix/store/13mh...' is required, but there is no substituter that can build it
instead of the misleading (since there was no build)
error: build of '/nix/store/13mh...' failed
Fixes#6295.
For each `nix.conf` option, add an empty html node with a unique `id`
that can be used as an anchor target. Also make the name of the option
be a link to that target so that it’s easily discoverable.
We can’t rewrite the whole list as an html definition list like it’s
done for the builtins because these options also appear in a man page,
and the manpage renderer (lowdown) can’t render arbitrary html. But the
hack here allows to keep the manpage and have the links in the html
version.
Fix https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/5745
Saving the cwd fd didn't actually work well -- prior to this commit, the
following would happen:
: ~/w/vc/nix ; doas outputs/out/bin/nix --experimental-features 'nix-command flakes' run nixpkgs#coreutils -- --coreutils-prog=pwd
pwd: couldn't find directory entry in ‘../../../..’ with matching i-node
: ~/w/vc/nix ; doas outputs/out/bin/nix --experimental-features 'nix-command flakes' develop -c pwd
pwd: couldn't find directory entry in ‘../../../..’ with matching i-node
This doesn't work very well (maybe I'm misunderstanding the desired
implementation):
: ~/w/vc/nix ; doas outputs/out/bin/nix --experimental-features 'nix-command flakes' develop -c pwd
pwd: couldn't find directory entry in ‘../../../..’ with matching i-node
I regularly pass around simple scripts by using nix-shell as the script
interpreter, eg. like this:
#!/usr/bin/env nix-shell
#!nix-shell -p dd_rescue coreutils bash -i bash
While this works most of the time, I recently had one occasion where it
would not and the above would result in the following:
$ sudo ./myscript.sh
bash: ./myscript.sh: No such file or directory
Note the "sudo" here, because this error only occurs if we're root.
The reason for the latter is because running Nix as root means that we
can directly access the store, which makes sure we use a filesystem
namespace to make the store writable. XXX - REWORD!
So when stracing the process, I stumbled on the following sequence:
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/proc/self/ns/mnt", O_RDONLY) = 3
unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) = 0
... later ...
getcwd("/the/real/cwd", 4096) = 14
setns(3, CLONE_NEWNS) = 0
getcwd("/", 4096) = 2
In the whole strace output there are no calls to chdir() whatsoever, so
I decided to look into the kernel source to see what else could change
directories and found this[1]:
/* Update the pwd and root */
set_fs_pwd(fs, &root);
set_fs_root(fs, &root);
The set_fs_pwd() call is roughly equivalent to a chdir() syscall and
this is called when the setns() syscall is invoked[2].
[1]: b14ffae378/fs/namespace.c (L4659)
[2]: b14ffae378/kernel/nsproxy.c (L346)
Impure derivations are derivations that can produce a different result
every time they're built. Example:
stdenv.mkDerivation {
name = "impure";
__impure = true; # marks this derivation as impure
outputHashAlgo = "sha256";
outputHashMode = "recursive";
buildCommand = "date > $out";
};
Some important characteristics:
* This requires the 'impure-derivations' experimental feature.
* Impure derivations are not "cached". Thus, running "nix-build" on
the example above multiple times will cause a rebuild every time.
* They are implemented similar to CA derivations, i.e. the output is
moved to a content-addressed path in the store. The difference is
that we don't register a realisation in the Nix database.
* Pure derivations are not allowed to depend on impure derivations. In
the future fixed-output derivations will be allowed to depend on
impure derivations, thus forming an "impurity barrier" in the
dependency graph.
* When sandboxing is enabled, impure derivations can access the
network in the same way as fixed-output derivations. In relaxed
sandboxing mode, they can access the local filesystem.
