We don't just want to pass `--enable-gc=no`; we also want to make sure
boehmgc is not a dependency. Creating a nix-level configuration option
to do both, and then using that for the CI job, is more robust.
Changes:
- CPP variable is now `USE_READLINE` not `READLINE`
- `configure.ac` supports with new CLI flag
- `package.nix` supports with new configuration option
- `flake.nix` CIs this (along with no markdown)
Remove old Ubuntu 16.04 stop-gap too, as that is now quite old.
Motivation:
- editline does not build for Windows, but readline *should*. (I am
still working on this in Nixpkgs at this time, however. So there will
be a follow-up Nix PR removing the windows-only skipping of the
readline library once I am done.)
- Per
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/nix/-/blob/master/debian/rules?ref_type=heads#L27
and #2551, Debian builds Nix with readline. Now we better support and
CI that build configuration.
This is picking up where #2551 left off, ensuring we test a few more
things not merely have CPP for them.
Co-authored-by: Weijia Wang <9713184+wegank@users.noreply.github.com>
Also move `SourcePath` into `libutil`.
These changes allow `error.hh` and `error.cc` to access source path and
position information, which we can use to produce better error messages
(for example, we could consider omitting filenames when two or more
consecutive stack frames originate from the same file).
* deduplicate installation instructions
- reorder sections to present pinned installation more prominently
- remove outdated notes on the macOS installer rework
- update instructions to handle the installer tarball
Co-authored-by: Travis A. Everett <travis.a.everett@gmail.com>
This sets up infrastructure in libutil to allow for signing other than
by a secret key in memory. #9076 uses this to implement remote signing.
(Split from that PR to allow reviewing in smaller chunks.)
Co-Authored-By: Raito Bezarius <masterancpp@gmail.com>
The thing we wanted to test was that building Nix without building or
running tests, and without depending on libraries only needed by tests,
works.
But since 6c8f4ef350, we can also install
unit tests, and during the conversion to using `package.nix` this
started happening more often (they go to a separate output though, so
this should be fine).
This adds more `... = false` to restore the original intent: don't run
unit test or functional tests, and don't install unit tests.
This avoids a Value allocation for empty list constants. During a `nix
search nixpkgs`, about 82% of all thunked lists are empty, so this
removes about 3 million Value allocations.
Performance comparison on `nix search github:NixOS/nixpkgs/e1fa12d4f6c6fe19ccb59cac54b5b3f25e160870 --no-eval-cache`:
maximum RSS: median = 3845432.0000 mean = 3845432.0000 stddev = 0.0000 min = 3845432.0000 max = 3845432.0000 [rejected?, p=0.00000, Δ=-70084.00000±0.00000]
soft page faults: median = 965395.0000 mean = 965394.6667 stddev = 1.1181 min = 965392.0000 max = 965396.0000 [rejected?, p=0.00000, Δ=-17929.77778±38.59610]
system CPU time: median = 1.8029 mean = 1.7702 stddev = 0.0621 min = 1.6749 max = 1.8417 [rejected, p=0.00064, Δ=-0.12873±0.09905]
user CPU time: median = 14.1022 mean = 14.0633 stddev = 0.1869 min = 13.8118 max = 14.3190 [not rejected, p=0.03006, Δ=-0.18248±0.24928]
elapsed time: median = 15.8205 mean = 15.8618 stddev = 0.2312 min = 15.5033 max = 16.1670 [not rejected, p=0.00558, Δ=-0.28963±0.29434]
since `up` and `values` are both pointer-aligned the type field will
also be pointer-aligned, wasting 48 bits of space on most machines. we
can get away with removing the type field altogether by encoding some
information into the `with` expr that created the env to begin with,
reducing the GC load for the absolutely massive amount of single-entry
envs we create for lambdas. this reduces memory usage of system eval by
quite a bit (reducing heap size of our system eval from 8.4GB to 8.23GB)
and gives similar savings in eval time.
running `nix eval --raw --impure --expr 'with import <nixpkgs/nixos> {}; system'`
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 5.576 s ± 0.003 s [User: 5.197 s, System: 0.378 s]
Range (min … max): 5.572 s … 5.581 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 5.408 s ± 0.002 s [User: 5.019 s, System: 0.388 s]
Range (min … max): 5.405 s … 5.411 s 10 runs
