We don't apply any patches to it, and vendoring it locks users into
bugs (it hasn't been updated since its introduction in late 2021).
Closes https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/164
Change-Id: Ied071c841fc30b0dfb575151afd1e7f66970fdb9
(cherry picked from commit 80405d06264f0de1c16ee2646388ab501df20628)
This turns errors like:
error: flake output attribute 'hydraJobs' is not a derivation or path
into errors like:
error: expected flake output attribute 'hydraJobs' to be a derivation or
path but found a set: { binaryTarball = «thunk»; build = «thunk»; etc> }
This change affects all InstallableFlake commands.
Source: 20981461d4
Signed-off-by: Jörg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io>
The JSON format no longer uses the legacy ATerm `r:` prefixing nonsese,
but separate fields.
Progress on #9866
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
Basically I'd expect the same behavior as with `nix-build`, i.e.
with `--keep-going` the hash-mismatch error of each failing
fixed-output derivation is shown.
The approach is derived from `Store::buildPaths` (`entry-point.cc`):
instead of throwing the first build-result, check if there are any build
errors and if so, display all of them and throw after that.
Unfortunately, the BuildResult struct doesn't have an `ErrorInfo`
(there's a FIXME for that at least), so I have to construct my own here.
This is a rather cheap bugfix and I decided against touching too many
parts of libstore for that (also I don't know if that's in line with the
ongoing refactoring work).
Closes https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/302
Change-Id: I378ab984fa271e6808c6897c45e0f070eb4c6fac
Signed-off-by: Jörg Thalheim <joerg@thalheim.io>
previously we reported the error at the beginning of the binding
block (for plain inherits) or the beginning of the attr list (for
inherit-from), effectively hiding where exactly the error happened.
this also carries over to runtime positions of attributes in sets as
reported by unsafeGetAttrPos. we're not worried about this changing
observable eval behavior because it *is* marked unsafe, and the new
behavior is much more useful.
we already normalize attr order to lexicographic, doing the same for
formals makes sense. doubly so because the order of formals would
otherwise depend on the context of the expression, which is not quite as
useful as one might expect.
