Previously, IFDs would be built within the eval store, even though one
is typically using `--eval-store` precisely to *avoid* local builds.
Because the resulting Nix expression must be copied back to the eval
store in order to be imported, this requires the eval store to trust
the build store's signatures.
There's no good reason to deprecate it:
- For consistency reasons it should continue to exist, such that all
primitive types have a corresponding `builtins.is*` primop.
- There's no implementation cost to continuing to have this function
- It costs users time to try to migrate away from it, e.g.
https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/219747 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/275548
- Using it can give easier-to-read code like `all isNull list`
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
this also reduces forceValue code size and removes the need for
hideInDiagnostics. coopting thunk forcing like this has the additional
benefit of clarifying how these errors can happen in the first place.
forceValue is extremely hot. interestingly adding likeliness annotations
to the branches does not seem to make a difference.
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.224 s ± 0.005 s [User: 3.711 s, System: 0.512 s]
Range (min … max): 4.218 s … 4.234 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.140 s ± 0.009 s [User: 3.647 s, System: 0.492 s]
Range (min … max): 4.130 s … 4.152 s 10 runs
almost all uses of this are interactive, except for deepSeq. deepSeq is
going to be expensive and rare enough to not care much about, and
Value::determinePos should usually be cheap enough to not be too much of
a burden in any case.
~1% parser speedup from not using TLS indirections, less on system eval.
this could have also gone in flex yyextra data, but that's significantly
slower for some reason (albeit still faster than thread locals).
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.231 s ± 0.004 s [User: 3.725 s, System: 0.504 s]
Range (min … max): 4.226 s … 4.240 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.224 s ± 0.005 s [User: 3.711 s, System: 0.512 s]
Range (min … max): 4.218 s … 4.234 s 10 runs
~2% speedup on parsing without eval, less (but still significant) on
system eval. having flex generate faster parsers leads to very strange
misparses. maybe re2c is worth investigating.
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.260 s ± 0.003 s [User: 3.754 s, System: 0.505 s]
Range (min … max): 4.257 s … 4.266 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.231 s ± 0.004 s [User: 3.725 s, System: 0.504 s]
Range (min … max): 4.226 s … 4.240 s 10 runs
as written the comparisons generate copies, even though it looks as
though they shouldn't.
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.396 s ± 0.002 s [User: 3.894 s, System: 0.501 s]
Range (min … max): 4.393 s … 4.399 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.260 s ± 0.003 s [User: 3.754 s, System: 0.505 s]
Range (min … max): 4.257 s … 4.266 s 10 runs
checking for isBlackhole in the forceValue hot path is rather more
expensive than necessary, and with a little bit of trickery we can move
such handling into the isApp case. small performance benefit, but under
some circumstances we've seen 2% improvement as well.
〉 nix eval --raw --impure --expr 'with import <nixpkgs/nixos> {}; system'
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.429 s ± 0.002 s [User: 3.929 s, System: 0.500 s]
Range (min … max): 4.427 s … 4.433 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.396 s ± 0.002 s [User: 3.894 s, System: 0.501 s]
Range (min … max): 4.393 s … 4.399 s 10 runs
resizing a std::string clears the newly added bytes, which is not
necessary here and comes with a ~1.4% slowdown on our test nixos config.
〉 nix eval --raw --impure --expr 'with import <nixpkgs/nixos> {}; system'
before:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.486 s ± 0.003 s [User: 3.978 s, System: 0.507 s]
Range (min … max): 4.482 s … 4.492 s 10 runs
after:
Time (mean ± σ): 4.429 s ± 0.002 s [User: 3.929 s, System: 0.500 s]
Range (min … max): 4.427 s … 4.433 s 10 runs
This keeps hint messages, source location information, and source code
snippets grouped together, while making stack traces shorter (so that
more stack frames can be viewed on the same terminal).
Before:
error:
… while evaluating the attribute 'body'
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:4:3:
3|
4| body = x "x";
| ^
5| }
… from call site
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:4:10:
3|
4| body = x "x";
| ^
5| }
… while calling 'x'
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:2:7:
1| let {
2| x = arg: assert arg == "y"; 123;
| ^
3|
error: assertion '(arg == "y")' failed
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:2:12:
1| let {
2| x = arg: assert arg == "y"; 123;
| ^
3|
After:
error:
… while evaluating the attribute 'body'
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:4:3:
3|
4| body = x "x";
| ^
5| }
… from call site
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:4:10:
3|
4| body = x "x";
| ^
5| }
… while calling 'x'
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:2:7:
1| let {
2| x = arg: assert arg == "y"; 123;
| ^
3|
error: assertion '(arg == "y")' failed
at /Users/wiggles/nix/tests/functional/lang/eval-fail-assert.nix:2:12:
1| let {
2| x = arg: assert arg == "y"; 123;
| ^
3|
`eval-system` option overrides just the value of `builtins.currentSystem`.
This is more useful than overriding `system` since you can build these
derivations on remote builders which can work on the given system.
Co-authored-by: John Ericson <John.Ericson@Obsidian.Systems>
Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
I wrote the `configure.ac` wrong, and so we just got no builds
supporting ACLs.
Also, it needs to be more precise because Darwin puts other stuff in
that same header, evidently.
I don't love the way this code looks. There are two larger problems:
- eval, build/scratch, destination stores (#5025) should have different
types to reflect the fact that they are used for different purposes
and those purposes correspond to different operations. It should be
impossible to "use the wrong store" in my cases.
- Since drvs can end up in both the eval and build/scratch store, we
should have some sort of union/layered store (not on the file sytem
level, just conceptual level) that allows accessing both. This would
get rid of the ugly "check both" boilerplate in this PR.
Still, it might be better to land this now / soon after minimal cleanup,
so we have a concrete idea of what problem better abstractions are
supposed to solve.
