nix-super/tests/functional/lang/eval-okay-deprecate-cursed-or.nix
Ryan Hendrickson da332d678e libexpr: deprecate the bogus "or"-as-variable
As a prelude to making "or" work like a normal variable, emit a warning
any time the "fn or" production is used in a context that will change
how it is parsed when that production is refactored.

In detail: in the future, OR_KW will be moved to expr_simple, and the
cursed ExprCall production that is currently part of the expr_select
nonterminal will be generated "normally" in expr_app instead. Any
productions that accept an expr_select will be affected, except for the
expr_app nonterminal itself (because, while expr_app has a production
accepting a bare expr_select, its other production will continue to
accept "fn or" expressions). So all we need to do is emit an appropriate
warning when an expr_simple representing a cursed ExprCall is accepted
in one of those productions without first going through expr_app.

As the warning message describes, users can suppress the warning by
wrapping their problematic "fn or" expressions in parentheses. For
example, "f g or" can be made future-proof by rewriting it as
"f (g or)"; similarly "[ x y or ]" can be rewritten as "[ x (y or) ]",
etc. The parentheses preserve the current grouping behavior, as in the
future "f g or" will be parsed as "(f g) or", just like
"f g anything-else" is grouped. (Mechanically, this suppresses the
warning because the problem ExprCalls go through the
"expr_app : expr_select" production, which resets the cursed status on
the ExprCall.)
2024-09-20 15:57:36 -04:00

11 lines
372 B
Nix

let
# These are cursed and should warn
cursed0 = builtins.length (let or = 1; in [ (x: x) or ]);
cursed1 = let or = 1; in (x: x * 2) (x: x + 1) or;
cursed2 = let or = 1; in { a = 2; }.a or (x: x) or;
# These are uses of `or` as an identifier that are not cursed
allowed0 = let or = (x: x); in map or [];
allowed1 = let f = (x: x); or = f; in f (f or);
in
0