This also bans various sneaking of negative numbers from the language
into unsuspecting builtins as was exposed while auditing the
consequences of changing the Nix language integer type to a newtype.
It's unlikely that this change comprehensively ensures correctness when
passing integers out of the Nix language and we should probably add a
checked-narrowing function or something similar, but that's out of scope
for the immediate change.
During the development of this I found a few fun facts about the
language:
- You could overflow integers by converting from unsigned JSON values.
- You could overflow unsigned integers by converting negative numbers
into them when going into Nix config, into fetchTree, and into flake
inputs.
The flake inputs and Nix config cannot actually be tested properly
since they both ban thunks, however, we put in checks anyway because
it's possible these could somehow be used to do such shenanigans some
other way.
Note that Lix has banned Nix language integer overflows since the very
first public beta, but threw a SIGILL about them because we run with
-fsanitize=signed-overflow -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error in
production builds. Since the Nix language uses signed integers, overflow
was simply undefined behaviour, and since we defined that to trap, it
did.
Trapping on it was a bad UX, but we didn't even entirely notice
that we had done this at all until it was reported as a bug a couple of
months later (which is, to be fair, that flag working as intended), and
it's got enough production time that, aside from code that is IMHO buggy
(and which is, in any case, not in nixpkgs) such as
https://git.lix.systems/lix-project/lix/issues/445, we don't think
anyone doing anything reasonable actually depends on wrapping overflow.
Even for weird use cases such as doing funny bit crimes, it doesn't make
sense IMO to have wrapping behaviour, since two's complement arithmetic
overflow behaviour is so *aggressively* not what you want for *any* kind
of mathematics/algorithms. The Nix language exists for package
management, a domain where bit crimes are already only dubiously in
scope to begin with, and it makes a lot more sense for that domain for
the integers to never lose precision, either by throwing errors if they
would, or by being arbitrary-precision.
Fixes: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/issues/10968
Original-CL: https://gerrit.lix.systems/c/lix/+/1596
Change-Id: I51f253840c4af2ea5422b8a420aa5fafbf8fae75
The actual motive here is the avoidance of integer overflow if we were
to make these use checked NixInts and retain the subtraction.
However, the actual *intent* of this code is a three-way comparison,
which can be done with operator<=>, so we should just do *that* instead.
Change-Id: I7f9a7da1f3176424b528af6d1b4f1591e4ab26bf
* manual: Contributing -> Development, Hacking -> Building
what's currently called "hacking" are really instructions for setting up
a development environment and compiling from source. we have
a contribution guide in the repo (which rightly focuses on GitHub
workflows), and the material in the manual is more about working
on the code itself.
since we'd otherwise have three headings that amount to "Building Nix",
this change also moves the "classic Nix" instructions to the top.
we may want to reorganise this in the future, and bring
contributor-oriented information closer to the code, but for now let's
stick to more accurate names to ease navigation.
* fix NIX_PATH overriding
- test restricted evaluation
- test precedence for setting the search path
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <robert@roberthensing.nl>
Co-authored-by: John Ericson <git@JohnEricson.me>
This is in accordance with ARM's naming convention.
"Low" is confusing, because it could refer to either the cold end
of the stack as an abstract data type, or a low address.
These are different places, because the stack grows down through
the address space.
In _very_ rare cases (I had about 7 cases out of 32200 files!),
the order of how inherit-from bindings are printed when using
`nix-instantiate --parse` gets messed up.
The cause of this seems to be because the std::map the bindings are
placed in is keyed on a _pointer_, which then uses an
[implementation-defined strict total order](https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_comparison#Pointer_total_order).
The fix here is to key the bindings on their displacement instead,
which maintains the same order as they appear in the file.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to make a reproducible test for this in the
source, there's something about the local environment that makes it
unreproducible for me.
However I was able to make a reproducible test in a Nix build on a Nix
version from a very recent master:
nix build github:infinisil/non-det-nix-parsing-repro
Co-authored-by: Robert Hensing <roberth@users.noreply.github.com>
The default value for the setting was evaluated by
calling a method on the object _being currently constructed_,
so we were using it before all fields were initialized.
This has been fixed by making the called method static,
and not using the previously used fields at all.
But functionality hasn't changed!
The fields were usually always zero (by chance?) anyway,
meaning the conditional path was always taken.
Thus the current logic has been kept, the code simplified,
and UB removed.
This was found with the helper of UBSan.
Splitting it out immediately answers questions like [this],
without increasing the number of compilation units.
I did consider using boost::hash_combine instead, but it doesn't seem
to be quite as capable, accepting only two arguments.
[this]: https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/11113#discussion_r1679991573
This makes it possible to certain discern failures from empty
snippets, which I think is an ok review comment.
Maybe it should do so for swapped column indexes too, but I'm not
sure.
I don't think it matters in the grand scheme. We don't even have
a real use case for `nullopt` now anyway.
Since we don't have a use case, I'm not applying this logic to
higher level functions yet.
Unfortunately these don't render correctly, because they go into the
markdown renderer, instead of the terminal.
```
nix-repl> :doc lib.version
Attribute '[35;1mversion[0m'
… defined at [35;1m/home/user/h/nixpkgs/lib/default.nix:73:40[0m
```
We could switch that to go direct to the terminal, but then we should
do the same for the primops, to get a consistent look.
Reverting for now.
This reverts commit 3413e0338cbee1c7734d5cb614b5325e51815cde.
fetchurl can be given a name and url aside from just the url.
Giving a name can be useful if the url has invalid characters such as
tilde for the store.
... at call sites that are may be in the hot path.
I do not know how clever the compiler gets at these sites.
My primary concern is to not regress performance and I am confident
that this achieves it the easy way.
Known behavior changes:
- `MemorySourceAccessor`'s comparison operators no longer forget to
compare the `SourceAccessor` base class.
Progress on #10832
What remains for that issue is hopefully much easier!
- Fix eval cache not being persisted in `nix develop` (since #10570)
- Don't attempt to commit cache transaction if there is no active transaction, which will spew errors in edge cases
- Drive-by: trivial typo fix
Progress on #5638
There are still a global fetcher and eval settings, but they are pushed
down into `libnixcmd`, which is a lot less bad a place for this sort of
thing.
Continuing process pioneered in
52bfccf8d8.
This improves the error message of nix-env -qa, among others, which
is crucial for understanding some ofborg eval error reports, such as
https://gist.github.com/GrahamcOfBorg/89101ca9c2c855d288178f1d3c78efef
After this change, it will report the same trace, but also start with
```
error:
… while evaluating the attribute 'devShellTools'
… while evaluating the attribute 'nixos'
… while evaluating the attribute 'docker-tools-nix-shell'
… while evaluating the attribute 'aarch64-darwin'
… from call site
at /home/user/h/nixpkgs/outpaths.nix:48:6:
47| tweak = lib.mapAttrs
48| (name: val:
| ^
49| if name == "recurseForDerivations" then true
<same>
```
move together all syntactic and semantic information into one
page, and add a page on data types, which in turn links to the syntax and
semantics.
also split out the note on scoping rules into its own page.
Co-authored-by: Ryan Hendrickson <ryan.hendrickson@alum.mit.edu>
